Corporate Tax

5 diagrams present how tax reform can deal with dangerous corporate conduct

The Build Back Better agenda negotiated in Congress includes extensive public investments to make our economy fairer, more sustainable and more resilient to future crises. Another great potential benefit: multiple tax reforms on the table to fund the plan would also reduce economic inequality and curb harmful corporate behavior.

Here we highlight corporate tax proposals at play on Capitol Hill that aim to prevent corporate tax evasion and offshoring, excessive CEO salaries, and wasteful share buybacks.

Tax evasion and offshoring

For decades, large corporations have played countries off against each other in order to keep reducing their own tax burdens. This has put a huge strain on public budgets for education, health care and other important investments. In the United States, the percentage of total federal corporate tax revenue decreased from 32.1 percent in 1952 to 6.6 percent in 2019, according to the United States Office for Administration and Budget.

The Biden government has just reached an agreement with more than 130 governments aimed at ending this global race to the bottom. Each of these governments has agreed to impose a “global minimum tax” on corporate profits of at least 15 percent.

With the rampant abuse of tax havens and other loopholes, many U.S. companies have gotten away with paying a much lower effective tax rate (The Effective is what companies actually pay while that legally Tax rate is what you owe before considering tax breaks and credits). One Government survey found that U.S.-based multinational corporations paid an average U.S. tax rate of just 7.8 percent in 2018 Institute for Taxes and Economic Policy found that 55 large, profitable US corporations actually paid no federal income taxes for the past year.

The new corporate minimum tax would be estimated at US revenue $ 148 billion over a decade. This would go a long way in helping to cover the cost of major investments under the Build Back Better agenda. For example, it is more than enough to pay universal free community college and more than double the cost of affordable construction, Barrier-free living for more than 300,000 families.

Democratic lawmakers are also considering closing various other loopholes that have encouraged the use of offshore tax havens. The House of Representatives Committee on Ways and Means has proposed further international tax reforms that exceed $ 300 billion over 10 years, while President Joe Biden’s larger plan is up to $ 1 trillion.

Increase in the corporate tax rate

In addition to reforms aimed at reducing offshore tax evasion, Democratic lawmakers plan to increase the statutory rate on domestic profits to ensure that big companies pay their fair share. Republicans cut that rate from 35 percent to 21 percent in 2017, a move that cost the country $ 750 billion over a decade if it stays the same.

Democrats have divergent views on the ideal rate hike. President Biden is proposing an increase to 28 percent, while Senator Joe Manchin has called for a rate of no more than 25 percent as he cites concerns about expanding corporate activities into countries with lower taxes. These concerns while getting exaggerated, are even less of an issue thanks to the global minimum tax agreement. As negotiations continue, hundreds of billions of dollars in major Build Back Better mutual funds are on the scales.

The White House proposal would $ 858 billion over a decade, more than twice as much as that $ 400 billion expected by the Manchin Plan. The revenue gap between these two proposals would be more than enough to fund President Biden’s proposal in full $ 400 billion investment remove the waiting list for affordable home care and create good jobs with caregiver services. The House Ways and Means Committee has proposed a rate of 26.5 percent, which is an estimated $ 540 billion.

Excessive executive board remuneration

Corporate lobbyists have long made the false claim that lower corporate taxes are guaranteed to be a boon to US workers. In reality, rather than raising wages, large corporations have plowed tax cuts into the pockets of executives and wealthy shareholders. According to Office for Administration and Budget and the Economic Policy Institute, when corporate tax revenue was 21.8 percent of all federal revenue in 1965, the average CEO to average worker wage ratio was 21 to 1. After the Republican tax cuts, corporate tax revenue fell to just 6.6 percent of federal revenue in 2019, the average rose Wage share to 320 to 1.

List of revenue options from Senate Finance Committee Chairman Ron Wyden includes a consumption tax That would encourage companies to share their wealth by penalizing companies with large gaps between CEO and worker salaries. Although the details of the Wyden Plan are not public, the proposal is undoubtedly from the Excessive CEO Salary Actwhich provides for a gradual increase in the corporate tax rate based on the salary ratio between the highest-paid executive in a company and the middle-class employee. Senate Budget Chairman Bernie Sanders campaigned for this bill, which was also approved by the AFL-CIO, the Center for American Progress, and numerous others Organizations and Academics.

Share buybacks

Wyden also aims to use tax policy to curb another controversial corporate activity – share buybacks. He and Senator Sherrod Brown recently got the Stock Buyback Accountability Act, which imposes a 2 percent excise tax on share buybacks and an estimated $ 100 billion over 10 years.

Like Professor William Lazonick and other analysts Long-documented, share buybacks artificially increase executive stock-based compensation and siphon off capital that could be used to raise workers’ wages or other productive investments. In the first year after the 2017 Republican tax cuts, S&P 500 companies spent a record $ 806 billion buying back their own shares. While buyback spending fell in the early stages of the pandemic crisis, it is now recovering to near record levels. Corresponding Standard and Poor’s, S&P 500 companies wasted nearly $ 200 billion on share buybacks in the second quarter of this year.

Wealthy Americans reap most of the financial gains from these share buybacks and corporate tax cuts due to their disproportionate ownership of company stocks. Federal Reserve data say the richest 1 percent own more than half of all stocks and mutual funds, while the bottom 90 percent of Americans own just 11 percent. The differences in stock ownership are even greater when you include race. While 61 percent of white families owned at least some of the shares in 2019, this was only 34 percent of black and 24 percent of Latino families, according to the Federal Reserve.

The Build Back Better negotiations are a great opportunity to secure investments in health, education, and infrastructure that will really change the lives of Americans. These negotiations also create an opening for long overdue tax reforms. With enough public pressure, we can ensure that wealthy and large corporations are paying their fair share – and discouraging corporate behavior that harms us all.

This piece was reprinted by Truthout with permission or license. It may not be reproduced in any form without permission or license from the source.

Related Articles